You will turn uncertainty into actionable trust. By fusing Bayesian inference with agent performance data, you’ll prevent sycophancy and ensure that the debate’s final verdict is statistically sound.
This role pioneers the first end‑to‑end Bayesian ensemble that operates in a live, multi‑agent debate, blending probabilistic programming with LLM confidence signals—a technique that has no direct precedent in commercial systems.
Cross‑Agent Confidence Calibration via Bayesian Ensembles
From: Hallucination Amplification in Multi‑Agent Debate
The HEAD framework replaces majority voting with a Bayesian ensemble that weighs each agent’s self‑confidence and historical trust. This requires sophisticated probabilistic modeling and real‑time inference at scale.
A production‑ready Bayesian aggregation engine that dynamically updates agent weights, integrates external trust metrics, and exposes calibrated confidence scores to the debate orchestrator.
PhD in Statistics, Computer Science, or a related field.
Reduce voting bias and sycophancy by 30–40% in 12 months, enabling the debate system to maintain <3% hallucination rates even under adversarial conditions.
Lead the research arm that expands Bayesian confidence calibration to other AI domains, shaping the next wave of trustworthy decision engines.
If this sounds like the challenge you have been looking for, we want to hear from you. We value what you can build over where you have been.